<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</description>
        <dc:date>2010-07-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/10" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/8">
        <title>Measuring attitudes, behaviours, and influences in inner city victims of interpersonal violence (VIVs) - A Swiss emergency room pilot study



</title>
        <description>Background:
Switzerland is confronted with the problem of interpersonal violence. Violence is in the increase and the potential for aggression seems to be rising. Observations by hospitals discern an appalling increase of the severity of the injuries.. The aim of this study is to collect accurate information about the social environment, the motivation and possible reasons for violence. We also intend to investigate whether sociocultural, or ethnic differences among male victims exist.Material and Methods:  For the first time in Switzerland, this survey employed a validated questionnaire from the division of violence prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. The first part of the questionnaire addressed social and demographic factors which could influence the risk of violence: age, gender, duration of stay in Switzerland, nationality and educational level. Beside these social structural factors, the questionnaire included questions on experience of violent offences in the past, information about the most recent violent offence and intra and interpersonal facts. The questionnaire itself consists of 27 questions, translated into German and French. In a pilot study, the questionnaire was checked with adolescents for feasibility and comprehensibility.
Results:
69 male VIVs were interviewed at two hospitals in the Canton of Bern. Most of the adolescents emphasised that weapons were not used during their confrontations. It is astonishing that all of the young men considered themselves to be victims. Most of the brawls were incited after an exchange of verbal abuse and provocations with unfamiliar individuals. The rivals  could neither be classified with the help of ethnic categories nor identifiable groups of the youth scenes. The incidents took place in scenes, where  violence was more likely to happen. Interestingly and contrary to a general perception the offenders are well integrated into sport and leisure clubs. A further surprising result of our research is that the attitude towards religion differs between young men with experience of violence and non-violent men.DiscussionYouth violence is a health issue, which concerns us globally. The human and economic toll of violence on victims and offenders, their families, and on society in general is high. The economic costs associated with violence-related illness and disability is estimated to be millions of Swiss francs each year. Physicians and psychologists are compelled to identify the factors, which cause young people to be violent, to find out which interventions prove to be successful, and to design effective prevention programs. The identification of effective programs depends  on the availability of reliable and valid measures to assess changes in violence-related attitudes. In our efforts to create healthier communities, we need to investigate; document and do research on the causes and circumstances of youth violence.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Aristomenis Exadaktylos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anja Evangelisti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fiorenzo Anghern</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ursula Keller</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kathrin Dopke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Annette Ringger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Victor Jeger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heinz Zimmermann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Urs Laffer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Allan Guggenbuhl</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2010, 4:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-4-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/7">
        <title>Psychometric properties of questionnaires evaluating health-related quality of life and functional status in polytrauma patients with lower extremity injury		</title>
        <description>Background:
Long term disability is common among polytrauma patients. However, as yet little information exists on how to adequately measure functional status and health-related quality of life following polytrauma.AimsTo establish the unidimensionality, internal consistency and validity of two health-related quality of life measures and one functional status questionnaire among polytrauma patients.
Methods:
186 Patients with severe polytrauma including lower extremity injury completed the Sickness Impact Profile-136 (SIP-136), the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Health Survey (SF-36) and the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS) 15 months after injury. Unidimensionality and internal consistency was assessed by principal components analysis and Cronbach&apos;s alpha (&#945;). To test the construct validity of the questionnaires, predetermined hypotheses were tested.
Results:
The unidimensionality and internal consistency of the GARS and the SF-36, but not the SIP-136 were supported. The construct validity of the SF-36, GARS and to a lesser extent the SIP-136 was confirmed.
Conclusion:
The SF-36 and the GARS appear to be preferable for use in polytrauma patients over the SIP-136.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Lian Jansen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martijn Steultjens</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Herman Holtslag</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gert Kwakkel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joost Dekker</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2010, 4:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-06-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-4-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-06-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/6">
        <title>Effects of acute substance use and pre-injury substance abuse on traumatic brain injury severity in adults admitted to a trauma centre</title>
        <description>Background:
The aims of this study were to describe the occurrence of substance use at the time of injury and pre-injury substance abuse in patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Effects of acute substance use and pre-injury substance abuse on TBI severity were also investigated.
Methods:
A prospective study of 111 patients, aged 16-55 years, injured from May 2005 to May 2007 and hospitalised at the Trauma Referral Centre in Eastern Norway with acute TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-12). Based on structural brain damages shown on a computed tomography (CT) scan, TBI severity was defined by modified Marshall classification as less severe (score &lt;3) and more severe (score &#8805;3). Clinical definition of substance use (alcohol and/or other psychoactive substances) was applied when hospital admission records reflected blood alcohol levels or a positive drug screen, or when a physician verified influence by examining the patient. Pre-injury substance abuse (alcohol and drug problems) was screened by using the CAGE questionnaire.
Results:
Forty-seven percent of patients were positive for substance use on admission to hospital. Significant pre-injury substance abuse was reported by 26% of patients. Substance use at the time of injury was more frequent in the less severe group (p = 0.01). The frequency of pre-injury substance abuse was higher in the more severe group (30% vs. 23%). In a logistic regression model, acute substance use at time of injury tended to decrease the probability of more severe intracranial injury, but the effect was not statistically significant after adjusting for age, gender, education, cause of injury and substance abuse, OR = 0.39; 95% CI 0.11-1.35, p = 0.14. Patients with positive screens for pre-injury substance abuse (CAGE &#8805;2) were more likely to have more severe TBI in the adjusted regression analyses, OR = 4.05; 95% CI 1.10-15.64, p = 0.04.
Conclusions:
Acute substance use was more frequent in patients with less severe TBI caused by low-energy events such as falls, violence and sport accidents. Pre-injury substance abuse increased the probability of more severe TBI caused by high-energy trauma such as motor vehicle accidents and falls from higher levels. Preventive efforts to reduce substance consumption and abuse in at-risk populations are needed.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Nada Andelic</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tone Jerstad</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Solrun Sigurdardottir</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne-Kristine Schanke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leiv Sandvik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cecilie Roe</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2010, 4:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-4-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/5">
        <title>500 ml of blood loss does not decrease non-invasive tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) as measured by near infrared spectroscopy - A hypothesis generating pilot study in healthy adult women</title>
        <description>Background:
The goal when resuscitating trauma patients is to achieve adequate tissue perfusion. One parameter of tissue perfusion is tissue oxygen saturation (StO2), as measured by near infrared spectroscopy. Using a commercially available device, we investigated whether clinically relevant blood loss of 500 ml in healthy volunteers can be detected by changes in StO2 after a standardized ischemic event.
Methods:
We performed occlusion of the brachial artery for 3 minutes in 20 healthy female blood donors before and after blood donation. StO2 and total oxygenated tissue hemoglobin (O2Hb) were measured continuously at the thenar eminence. 10 healthy volunteers were assessed in the same way, to examine whether repeated vascular occlusion without blood donation exhibits time dependent effects.
Results:
Blood donation caused a substantial decrease in systolic blood pressure, but did not affect resting StO2 and O2Hb values. No changes were measured in the blood donor group in the reaction to the vascular occlusion test, but in the control group there was an increase in the O2Hb rate of recovery during the reperfusion phase.
Conclusion:
StO2 measured at the thenar eminence seems to be insensitive to blood loss of 500 ml in this setting. Probably blood loss greater than this might lead to detectable changes guiding the treating physician. The exact cut off for detectable changes and the time effect on repeated vascular occlusion tests should be explored further. Until now no such data exist.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Victor Jeger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephan Jakob</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefano Fontana</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martin Wolf</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heinz Zimmermann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aristomenis Exadaktylos</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2010, 4:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-05-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-4-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-05-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/4">
        <title>Trauma management incorporating focused assessment with computed tomography in trauma (FACTT) - potential effect on survival</title>
        <description>Background:
Immediate recognition of life-threatening conditions and injuries is the key to trauma management. To date, the impact of focused assessment with computed tomography in trauma (FACTT) has not been formally assessed. We aimed to find out whether the concept of using FACTT during primary trauma survey has a negative or positive effect on survival.
Methods:
In a retrospective, multicentre study, we compared our time management and probability of survival (Ps) in major trauma patients who received FACTT during trauma resuscitation with the trauma registry of the German Trauma Society (DGU). FACTT is defined as whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) during primary trauma survey. We determined the probability of survival according to the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), the Revised Injury Severity Classification score (RISC) and the standardized mortality ratio (SMR).
Results:
We analysed 4.817 patients from the DGU database from 2002 until 2004, 160 (3.3%) were from our trauma centre at the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) and 4.657 (96.7%) from the DGU group. 73.2% were male with a mean age of 42.5 years, a mean ISS of 29.8. 96.2% had suffered from blunt trauma. Time from admission to FAST (focused assessment with sonography for trauma)(4.3 vs. 8.7 min), chest x-ray (8.1 vs. 16.0 min) and whole-body CT (20.7 vs. 36.6 min) was shorter at the LMU compared to the other trauma centres (p &lt; 0.001). SMR calculated by TRISS was 0.74 (CI95% 0.40-1.08) for the LMU (p = 0.24) and 0.92 (CI95% 0.84-1.01) for the DGU group (p = 0.10). RISC methodology revealed a SMR of 0.69 (95%CI 0.47-0.92) for the LMU (p = 0.043) and 1.00 (95%CI 0.94-1.06) for the DGU group (p = 0.88).
Conclusion:
Trauma management incorporating FACTT enhances a rapid response to life-threatening problems and enables a comprehensive assessment of the severity of each relevant injury. Due to its speed and accuracy, FACTT during primary trauma survey supports rapid decision-making and may increase survival.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Karl-Georg Kanz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>April Paul</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rolf Lefering</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Kay</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Uwe Kreimeier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ulrich Linsenmaier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wolf Mutschler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefan Huber-Wagner</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2010, 4:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-05-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-4-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-05-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/3">
        <title>A decade of experience with injuries to the gallbladder</title>
        <description>Background:
Considering that injuries to the gallbladder are rare, the purpose of this study was to evaluate injury patterns, operative procedures and outcomes in patients with trauma to the gallbladder. A retrospective review of traumatic injuries to the gallbladder at an urban level 1 trauma center from 1996 to 2008 was performed. Injuries were identified via imaging or during operative exploration.
Results:
Injuries to the gallbladder occurred in 45 patients, 40 (89%) of whom suffered penetrating trauma. Associated injuries were present in 44 (98%) patients, including 10 (22%) pancreatic injuries requiring repair and/or drainage. Patients were severely injured (49% hemodynamically unstable at presentation; mean Injury Severity Score = 20; mean length of stay = 22 days; mortality rate = 24%). Cholecystectomy was performed in 42 patients (93%), while the remaining 3 had drainage only as part of a &quot;damage control&quot; operation related to their critical physiologic status. Injuries to the extrahepatic biliary ducts occurred in 3 patients (7%) as well. Although all patients developed trauma related complications, none were a direct result of their biliary tract injuries.
Conclusion:
Injuries to the gallbladder are rare even in the busiest urban trauma centers. Almost all patients have associated intra-abdominal injuries, and nearly 50% of patients are hemodynamically unstable on admission. Rapid cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for all mechanisms of injury, except when the first operative procedure is of the damage control type.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Chad Ball</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elijah Dixon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francis Sutherland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kevin Laupland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Feliciano</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2010, 4:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-04-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-4-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-04-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/2">
        <title>Real-world car-to-pedestrian-crash data from an urban centre</title>
        <description>Background:
Pedestrians are at a high risk for crash and injury. This study aims at comparing data from real world crashes with data gathered from experimental settings.
Methods:
IMPAIR (In-Depth Medical Pedestrian Accident Investigation and Reconstruction) was a prospective, observational study performed in a metropolitan area. Data was collected on-scene, from clinical records, and interviews. Data comprise crash data, details on injury pattern and injury severity.
Results:
Thirty-seven pedestrians (of which 19 males) with a mean 37.1 years of age were included in the study. The mean collision speed was 49.5 km/h (SD 13.7, range, 28 - 93). The mean ISS (31.0, SD 25.4) and the 24% fatality rate indicate a substantial trauma load. The most common AIS 4+ injuries were to the head (23 subjects), followed by chest (8), pelvis (4), and abdomen (2). An association of impact side and injury side (right/left) was found for abdominal, chest, pelvic, and upper limb injuries. Primary head impacts were documented on the windscreen (19 subjects), hood (10), A-pillar (2), and edge of the car roof (2). With bivariate analysis, a significant increase of MAIS 4+ head injury risk was found for collision speeds of &gt;40 km/h (OR 9.00, 95% CI 1.96-41.36).
Conclusion:
The real-world data from this study is in agreement with previous findings from biomechanical models and other simulations. This data suggest that there may be reason to include further pedestrian regulations in EuroNCAP.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Uli Schmucker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Melissa Beirau</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Matthias Frank</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dirk Stengel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerrit Matthes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Axel Ekkernkamp</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julia Seifert</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2010, 4:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-4-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/1">
        <title>Complications related to deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in trauma: a systematic review of the literature</title>
        <description>Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis is essential to the appropriate management of multisystem trauma patients. Without thromboprophylaxis, the rate of venous thrombosis and subsequent pulmonary embolism is substantial. Three prophylactic modalities are common: pharmacologic anticoagulation, mechanical compression devices, and inferior vena cava filtration. A systematic review was completed using PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the potential complications of DVT prophylactic options. Level one evidence currently supports the use of low molecular weight heparins for thromboprophylaxis in the trauma patient. Unfortunately, multiple techniques are not infrequently required for complex multisystem trauma patients. Each modality has potential complications. The risks of heparin include bleeding and heparin induced thrombocytopenia. Mechanical compression devices can result in local soft tissue injury, bleeding and patient non-compliance. Inferior vena cava filters migrate, cause inferior vena cava occlusion, and penetrate the vessel wall. While the use of these techniques can be life saving, they must be appropriately utilized.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Indraneel Datta</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chad Ball</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lucas Rudmik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>S. Morad Hameed</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Kortbeek</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2010, 4:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-4-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/11">
        <title>Autologous bone graft versus demineralized bone matrix in internal fixation of ununited long bones</title>
        <description>Background:
Non-unions are severe complications in orthopaedic trauma care and occur in 10% of all fractures. The golden standard for the treatment of ununited fractures includes open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) as well as augmentation with autologous-bone-grafting. However, there is morbidity associated with the bone-graft donor site and some patients offer limited quantity or quality of autologous-bone graft material. Since allogene bone-grafts are introduced on the market, this comparative study aims to evaluate healing characteristics of ununited bones treated with ORIF combined with either iliac-crest-autologous-bone-grafting (ICABG) or demineralized-bone-matrix (DBM).Methods and resultsFrom 2000 to 2006 out of sixty-two consecutive patients with non-unions presenting at our Level I Trauma Center, twenty patients had ununited diaphyseal fractures of long bones and were treated by ORIF combined either by ICABG- (n = 10) or DBM-augmentation (n = 10). At the time of index-operation, patients of the DBM-group had a higher level of comorbidity (ASA-value: p = 0.014). Mean duration of follow-up was 56.6 months (ICABG-group) and 41.2 months (DBM-group). All patients were clinically and radiographically assessed and adverse effects related to bone grafting were documented. The results showed that two non-unions augmented with ICABG failed osseous healing (20%) whereas all non-unions grafted by DBM showed successful consolidation during the first year after the index operation (p = 0.146). No early complications were documented in both groups but two patients of the ICABG-group suffered long-term problems at the donor site (20%) (p = 0.146). Pain intensity were comparable in both groups (p = 0.326). However, patients treated with DBM were more satisfied with the surgical procedure (p = 0.031).
Conclusion:
With the use of DBM, the costs for augmentation of the non-union-site are more expensive compared to ICABG (calculated difference: 160 &#8364;/case). Nevertheless, this study demonstrated that the application of DBM compared to ICABG led to an advanced outcome in the treatment of non-unions and simultaneously to a decreased quantity of adverse effects. Therefore we conclude that DBM should be offered as an alternative to ICABG, in particular to patients with elevated comorbidity and those with limited availability or reduced quality of autologous-bone graft material.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Oliver Pieske</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexandra Wittmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Johannes Zaspel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Loeffler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bianca Rubenbauer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heiko Trentzsch</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefan Piltz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2009, 3:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-3-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/10">
        <title>Free Abdominal Fluid without obvious Solid Organ Injury upon CT imaging: an actual problem or simply over-diagnosing?</title>
        <description>Whereas a non-operative approach for hemodynamically stable patients with free intraabdominal fluid in the presence of solid organ injury is generally accepted, the presence of free fluid in the abdomen without evidence of solid organ injury not only presents a challenge for the treating emergency physician but also for the surgeon in charge. Despite recent advances in imaging modalities, with multi-detector computed tomography (CT) (with or without contrast agent) usually the imaging method of choice, diagnosis and interpretation of the results remains difficult. While some studies conclude that CT is highly accurate and relatively specific at diagnosing mesenteric and hollow viscus injury, others studies deem CT to be unreliable. These differences may in part be due to the experience and the interpretation of the radiologist and/or the treating physician or surgeon.A search of the literature has made it apparent that there is no straightforward answer to the question what to do with patients with free intraabdominal fluid on CT scanning but without signs of solid organ injury. In hemodynamically unstable patients, free intraabdominal fluid in the absence of solid organ injury usually mandates immediate surgical intervention. For patients with blunt abdominal trauma and more than just a trace of free intraabdominal fluid or for patients with signs of peritonitis, the threshold for a surgical exploration - preferably by a laparoscopic approach - should be low. Based on the available information, we aim to provide the reader with an overview of the current literature with specific emphasis on diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to this problem and suggest a possible algorithm, which might help with the adequate treatment of such patients.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Vanessa Banz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Butt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Victor Jeger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heinz Zimmermann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aristomenis Exadaktylos</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2009, 3:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-3-10</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
