<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</description>
        <dc:date>2012-03-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/1/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/6/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/6/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/2/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/5" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/10">
        <title>Free Abdominal Fluid without obvious Solid Organ Injury upon CT imaging: an actual problem or simply over-diagnosing?</title>
        <description>Whereas a non-operative approach for hemodynamically stable patients with free intraabdominal fluid in the presence of solid organ injury is generally accepted, the presence of free fluid in the abdomen without evidence of solid organ injury not only presents a challenge for the treating emergency physician but also for the surgeon in charge. Despite recent advances in imaging modalities, with multi-detector computed tomography (CT) (with or without contrast agent) usually the imaging method of choice, diagnosis and interpretation of the results remains difficult. While some studies conclude that CT is highly accurate and relatively specific at diagnosing mesenteric and hollow viscus injury, others studies deem CT to be unreliable. These differences may in part be due to the experience and the interpretation of the radiologist and/or the treating physician or surgeon.A search of the literature has made it apparent that there is no straightforward answer to the question what to do with patients with free intraabdominal fluid on CT scanning but without signs of solid organ injury. In hemodynamically unstable patients, free intraabdominal fluid in the absence of solid organ injury usually mandates immediate surgical intervention. For patients with blunt abdominal trauma and more than just a trace of free intraabdominal fluid or for patients with signs of peritonitis, the threshold for a surgical exploration - preferably by a laparoscopic approach - should be low. Based on the available information, we aim to provide the reader with an overview of the current literature with specific emphasis on diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to this problem and suggest a possible algorithm, which might help with the adequate treatment of such patients.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Vanessa Banz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Butt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Victor Jeger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heinz Zimmermann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aristomenis Exadaktylos</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2009, null:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-3-10</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-3-10-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/12">
        <title>Occult pneumothorax, revisited</title>
        <description>Pneumothorax is a recognized cause of preventable death following chest wall trauma where a simple intervention can be life saving. In cases of trauma patients where cervical spine immobilization is mandatory, supine AP chest radiograph is the most practical initial study. It is however not as sensitive as CT chest for early detection of a pneumothorax. &quot;Occult&quot; pneumothorax is an accepted definition of an existing but usually a clinically and radiologically silent disturbance that in most patients can be tolerated while other more urgent trauma needs are attended to. However, in certain patients, especially those on mechanical ventilation (with subsequent increase of intrapleural air with positive pressure ventilation), missing the diagnosis of pneumothorax can be deleterious with fatal consequences. This review will discuss the occult pneumothorax in the context of 3 radiological examples, which will further emphasize the entity. Because a negative AP chest radiograph can dangerously delay its recognition, we recommend that any trauma victim presenting to the emergency department with symptoms of respiratory distress should be screened with either thoracic ultrasonography or chest CT scan to avoid missing a pneumothorax.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Hesham Omar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hany Abdelmalak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Devanand Mangar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rania Rashad</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Engy Helal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Enrico Camporesi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2010, null:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-10-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-4-12</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-4-12-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-10-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/1/1/2">
        <title>The floating knee: epidemiology, prognostic indicators &amp; outcome following surgical management</title>
        <description>Background:
Floating Knee injuries are complex injuries. The type of fractures, soft tissue and associated injuries make this a challenging problem to manage. We present the outcome of these injuries after surgical management.
Methods:
29 patients with floating knee injuries were managed over a 3 year period. This was a prospective study were both fractures of the floating knee injury were surgically fixed using different modalities. The associated injuries were managed appropriately. Assessment of the end result was done by the Karlstrom criteria after bony union.
Results:
The mechanism of injury was road traffic accident in 27/29 patients. There were 38 associated injuries. 20/29 patients had intramedullary nailing for both fractures. The complications were knee stiffness, foot drop, delayed union of tibia and superficial infection. The bony union time ranged from 15 &#8211; 22.5 weeks for femur fractures and 17 &#8211; 28 weeks for the tibia. According to the Karlstrom criteria the end results were Excellent &#8211; 15, Good &#8211; 11, Acceptable &#8211; 1 and Poor &#8211; 3.
Conclusion:
The associated injuries and the type of fracture (open, intra-articular, comminution) are prognostic indicators in the Floating knee. Appropriate management of the associated injuries, intramedullary nailing of both the fractures and post operative rehabilitation are necessary for good final outcome.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/1/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Ulfin Rethnam</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rajam Yesupalan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rajagopalan Nair</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2007, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-11-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-1-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-1-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-11-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/1">
        <title>Complications related to deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in trauma: a systematic review of the literature</title>
        <description>Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis is essential to the appropriate management of multisystem trauma patients. Without thromboprophylaxis, the rate of venous thrombosis and subsequent pulmonary embolism is substantial. Three prophylactic modalities are common: pharmacologic anticoagulation, mechanical compression devices, and inferior vena cava filtration. A systematic review was completed using PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the potential complications of DVT prophylactic options. Level one evidence currently supports the use of low molecular weight heparins for thromboprophylaxis in the trauma patient. Unfortunately, multiple techniques are not infrequently required for complex multisystem trauma patients. Each modality has potential complications. The risks of heparin include bleeding and heparin induced thrombocytopenia. Mechanical compression devices can result in local soft tissue injury, bleeding and patient non-compliance. Inferior vena cava filters migrate, cause inferior vena cava occlusion, and penetrate the vessel wall. While the use of these techniques can be life saving, they must be appropriately utilized.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/4/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Indraneel Datta</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chad Ball</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lucas Rudmik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>S. Morad Hameed</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Kortbeek</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2010, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-4-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-4-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/11">
        <title>Autologous bone graft versus demineralized bone matrix in internal fixation of ununited long bones</title>
        <description>Background:
Non-unions are severe complications in orthopaedic trauma care and occur in 10% of all fractures. The golden standard for the treatment of ununited fractures includes open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) as well as augmentation with autologous-bone-grafting. However, there is morbidity associated with the bone-graft donor site and some patients offer limited quantity or quality of autologous-bone graft material. Since allogene bone-grafts are introduced on the market, this comparative study aims to evaluate healing characteristics of ununited bones treated with ORIF combined with either iliac-crest-autologous-bone-grafting (ICABG) or demineralized-bone-matrix (DBM).Methods and resultsFrom 2000 to 2006 out of sixty-two consecutive patients with non-unions presenting at our Level I Trauma Center, twenty patients had ununited diaphyseal fractures of long bones and were treated by ORIF combined either by ICABG- (n = 10) or DBM-augmentation (n = 10). At the time of index-operation, patients of the DBM-group had a higher level of comorbidity (ASA-value: p = 0.014). Mean duration of follow-up was 56.6 months (ICABG-group) and 41.2 months (DBM-group). All patients were clinically and radiographically assessed and adverse effects related to bone grafting were documented. The results showed that two non-unions augmented with ICABG failed osseous healing (20%) whereas all non-unions grafted by DBM showed successful consolidation during the first year after the index operation (p = 0.146). No early complications were documented in both groups but two patients of the ICABG-group suffered long-term problems at the donor site (20%) (p = 0.146). Pain intensity were comparable in both groups (p = 0.326). However, patients treated with DBM were more satisfied with the surgical procedure (p = 0.031).
Conclusion:
With the use of DBM, the costs for augmentation of the non-union-site are more expensive compared to ICABG (calculated difference: 160 &#8364;/case). Nevertheless, this study demonstrated that the application of DBM compared to ICABG led to an advanced outcome in the treatment of non-unions and simultaneously to a decreased quantity of adverse effects. Therefore we conclude that DBM should be offered as an alternative to ICABG, in particular to patients with elevated comorbidity and those with limited availability or reduced quality of autologous-bone graft material.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Oliver Pieske</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexandra Wittmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Johannes Zaspel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Loeffler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bianca Rubenbauer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heiko Trentzsch</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefan Piltz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2009, null:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-3-11</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-3-11-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/1">
        <title>Cost-effectiveness of an integrated &apos;fast track&apos; rehabilitation service for multi-trauma patients involving dedicated early rehabilitation intervention programs: design of a prospective, multi-centre, non-randomised clinical trial</title>
        <description>Background:
In conventional multi-trauma care service (CTCS), patients are admitted to hospital via the accident &amp; emergency room. After surgery they are transferred to the IC-unit followed by the general surgery ward. Ensuing treatment takes place in a hospital&apos;s outpatient clinic, a rehabilitation centre, a nursing home or the community. Typically, each of the CTCS partners may have its own more or less autonomous treatment perspective. Clinical evidence, however, suggests that an integrated multi-trauma rehabilitation approach (&apos;Supported Fast-track multi-Trauma Rehabilitation Service&apos;: SFTRS), featuring: 1) earlier transfer to a specialised trauma rehabilitation unit; 2) earlier start of &apos;non-weight-bearing&apos; training and multidisciplinary treatment; 3) well-documented treatment protocols; 4) early individual goal-setting; 5) co-ordination of treatment between trauma surgeon and physiatrist, and 6) shorter lengths-of-stay, may be more (cost-)effective.This paper describes the design of a prospective cohort study evaluating the (cost-) effectiveness of SFTRS relative to CTCS.Methods/designThe study population includes multi-trauma patients, admitted to one of the participating hospitals, with an Injury Severity Scale score &gt; = 16, complex multiple injuries in several extremities or complex pelvic and/or acetabulum fractures. In a prospective cohort study CTCS and SFTRS will be contrasted. The inclusion period is 19 months. The duration of follow-up is 12 months, with measurements taken at baseline, and at 3,6,9 and 12 months post-injury.Primary outcome measures are &apos;quality of life&apos; (SF-36) and &apos;functional health status&apos; (Functional Independence Measure). Secondary outcome measures are the Hospital Anxiety &amp; Depression Scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination as an indicator of cognitive functioning, and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure measuring the extent to which individual ADL treatment goals are met. Costs will be assessed using the PROductivity and DISease Questionnaire and a cost questionnaire.DiscussionThe study will yield results on the efficiency of an adapted care service for multi-trauma patients (SFTRS) featuring earlier (and condensed) involvement of specialised rehabilitation treatment. Results will show whether improved SFTRS logistics, combined with shorter stays in hospital and rehabilitation clinic and specialised early rehabilitation training modules are more (cost-) effective, relative to CTCS.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials register (ISRCTN68246661) and Netherlands Trial Register (NTR139).</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/3/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Sevginur Kosar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Henk Seelen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bena Hemmen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Silvia Evers</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Brink</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2009, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-01-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-3-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-3-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/6/1/1">
        <title>Injury characteristics and Outcome of Road traffic crash victims at Bugando Medical Centre in Northwestern Tanzania</title>
        <description>Background:
Road traffic crash is of growing public health importance worldwide contributing significantly to the global disease burden. There is paucity of published data on road traffic crashes in our local environment. This study was carried out to describe the injury characteristics and outcome of road traffic crash victims in our local setting and provide baseline data for establishment of prevention strategies as well as treatment protocols.
Methods:
This was a prospective hospital based study of road traffic crash victims carried out at Bugando Medical Centre in Northwestern Tanzania between March 2010 and February 2011. After informed consent to participate in the study, all patients were consecutively enrolled into the study. Data were collected using a pre-tested questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS computer software version 15.0.
Results:
A total of 1678 road traffic crash victims were studied. Their male to female ratio was of 2.1:1. The patients ages ranged from 3 to 78 years with the mean and median of 29.45 (&#177; 24.22) and 26.12 years respectively. The modal age group was 21-30 years, accounting for 52.1% patients. Students (58.8%) and businessmen (35.9%) were the majority of road traffic crash victims. Motorcycle (58.8%) was responsible for the majority of road traffic crashes. Musculoskeletal (60.5%) and the head (52.1%) were the most common body region injured. Open wounds (65.9%) and fractures (26.3%) were the most common type of injuries sustained. The majority of patients (80.3%) were treated surgically. Wound debridement was the most common procedure performed in 81.2% of the patients. The complication rate was 23.7%. The overall average length of hospital stay (LOS) was 23.5 &#177; 12.3 days. Mortality rate was 17.5%. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients who had severe trauma (Kampala Trauma Score II &#8804; 6) and those with long bone fractures stayed longer in the hospital and this was significant (P &lt; 0.001) whereas the age of the patient, severe trauma (Kampala Trauma Score II &#8804; 6), admission Systolic Blood Pressure &lt; 90 mmHg and severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Score = 3-8) significantly influenced mortality (P &lt; 0.001).
Conclusion:
Road traffic crashes constitute a major public health problem in our setting and contribute significantly to unacceptably high morbidity and mortality. Urgent preventive measures targeting at reducing the occurrence of road traffic crashes is necessary to reduce the morbidity and mortality resulting from these injuries. Early recognition and prompt treatment of road traffic injuries is essential for optimal patient outcome.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/6/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Phillipo Chalya</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Mabula</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ramesh Dass</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nkinda Mbelenge</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Isidori Ngayomela</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alphonce Chandika</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Japhet Gilyoma</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2012, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-6-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-6-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/6/1/4">
        <title>The song remains the same although the instruments are changing: complications following selective non-operative management of blunt spleen trauma: a retrospective review of patients at a level I trauma centre from 1996 to 2007</title>
        <description>Background:
Despite a widespread shift to selective non-operative management (SNOM) for blunt splenic trauma, there remains uncertainty regarding the role of adjuncts such as interventional radiological techniques, the need for follow-up imaging, and the incidence of long-term complications. We evaluated the success of SNOM (including splenic artery embolization, SAE) for the management of blunt splenic injuries in severely injured patients.
Methods:
Retrospective review (1996-2007) of the Alberta Trauma Registry and health records for blunt splenic trauma patients, aged 18 and older, with injury severity scores of 12 or greater, admitted to the Foothills Medical Centre.
Results:
Among 538 eligible patients, 150 (26%) underwent early operative intervention. The proportion of patients managed by SNOM rose from 50 to 78% over the study period, with an overall success rate of SNOM of 87%, while injury acuity remained unchanged over time. Among SNOM failures, 65% underwent surgery within 24 hours of admission. Splenic arterial embolization (SAE) was used in only 7% of patients managed non-operatively, although at least 21% of failed SNOM had contrast extravasation potentially amenable to SAE. Among Calgary residents undergoing SNOM, hospital readmission within six months was required in three (2%), all of whom who required emergent intervention (splenectomy 2, SAE 1) and in whom none had post-discharge follow-up imaging. Overall, the use of post-discharge follow-up CT imaging was low following SNOM (10%), and thus no CT images identified occult hemorrhage or pseudoaneurysm. We observed seven cases of delayed splenic rupture in our population which occurred from five days to two months following initial injury. Three of these occurred in the post-discharge period requiring readmission and intervention.
Conclusions:
SNOM was the initial treatment strategy for most patients with blunt splenic trauma with 13% requiring subsequent operative intervention intended for the spleen. Cases of delayed splenic rupture occurred up to two months following initial injury. The low use of both follow-up imaging and SAE make assessment of the utility of these adjuncts difficult and adherence to formalized protocols will be required to fully assess the benefit of multi-modality management strategies.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/6/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Aisling Clancy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Corina Tiruta</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dianne Ashman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chad Ball</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2012, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-6-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-6-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/2/1/5">
        <title>The profile of head injuries and traumatic brain injury deaths in Kashmir

</title>
        <description>This study was conducted on patients of head injury admitted through Accident &amp; Emergency Department of Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences during the year 2004 to determine the number of head injury patients, nature of head injuries, condition at presentation, treatment given in hospital and the outcome of intervention. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) deaths were also studied retrospectively for a period of eight years (1996 to 2003).The traumatic brain injury deaths showed a steady increase in number from year 1996 to 2003 except for 1999 that showed decline in TBI deaths. TBI deaths were highest in age group of 21&#8211;30 years (18.8%), followed by 11&#8211;20 years age group (17.8%) and 31&#8211;40 years (14.3%). The TBI death was more common in males. Maximum number of traumatic brain injury deaths was from rural areas as compared to urban areas.To minimize the morbidity and mortality resulting from head injury there is a need for better maintenance of roads, improvement of road visibility and lighting, proper mechanical maintenance of automobile and other vehicles, rigid enforcement of traffic rules, compulsory wearing of crash helmets by motor cyclist and scooterists and shoulder belt in cars and imparting compulsory road safety education to school children from primary education level. Moreover, appropriate medical care facilities (including trauma centres) need to be established at district level, sub-divisional and block levels to provide prompt and quality care to head injury patients</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/2/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Yattoo H</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Amin Tabish</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2008, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-06-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-2-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-2-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-06-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/5">
        <title>Improving prehospital trauma management for skiers and snowboarders - need for on-slope triage?</title>
        <description>Background:
Injuries from skiing and snowboarding became a major challenge for emergency care providers in Switzerland. In the alpine setting, early assessment of injury and health status is essential for the initiation of adequate means of care and transport. Nevertheless, validated standardized protocols for on-slope triage are missing. This article can assist in understanding the characteristics of injured winter sportsmen and exigencies for future on-slope triage protocols.
Methods:
Six-year review of trauma cases in a tertiary trauma centre. Consecutive inclusion of all injured skiers and snowboarders aged &gt;15 (total sample) years with predefined, severe injury to the head, spine, chest, pelvis or abdomen (study sample) presenting at or being transferred to the study hospital. Descriptive analysis of age, gender and injury pattern.
Results:
Amongst 729 subjects (total sample) injured from skiing or snowboarding, 401 (55%, 54% of skiers and 58% of snowboarders) suffered from isolated limb injury. Amongst the remaining 328 subjects (study sample), the majority (78%) presented with monotrauma. In the study sample, injury to the head (52%) and spine (43%) was more frequent than injury to the chest (21%), pelvis (8%), and abdomen (5%). The three most frequent injury combinations were head/spine (10% of study sample), head/thorax (9%), and spine/thorax (6%). Fisher&apos;s exact test demonstrated an association for injury combinations of head/thorax (p &lt; 0.001), head/abdomen (p = 0.019), and thorax/abdomen (p &lt; 0.001).
Conclusion:
The data presented and the findings from previous investigations indicate the need for development of dedicated on-slope triage protocols. Future research must address the validity and practicality of diagnostic on-slope tests for rapid decision making by both professional and lay first responders. Thus, large-scale and detailed injury surveillance is the future research priority.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Rebecca Hasler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Uli Schmucker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dimitrios Evangelopoulos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ron Hirschberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heinz Zimmermann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aristomenis Exadaktylos</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2011, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-04-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-5-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-5-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-04-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

