<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</description>
        <dc:date>2011-09-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/2" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/11">
        <title>Trauma center accessibility for road traffic injuries in Hanoi, Vietnam</title>
        <description>Background:
Rapid economic growth in Vietnam over the last decade has led to an increased frequency of road traffic injury (RTI), which now represents one of the leading causes of death in the nation. Various efforts toward injury prevention have not produced a significant decline in the incidence of RTIs. Our study sought to describe the geographic distribution of RTIs in Hanoi, Vietnam and to evaluate the accessibility of trauma centers to those injured in the city.
Methods:
We performed a cross-sectional study using Hanoi city police reports from 2006 to describe the epidemiology of RTIs occurring in Hanoi city. Additionally, we identified geographic patterns and determined the direct distance from injury sites to trauma centers by applying geographical information system (GIS) software. Factors associated with the accessibility of trauma centers were evaluated by multivariate regression analysis.
Results:
We mapped 1,271 RTIs in Hanoi city. About 40% of RTIs occurred among people 20-29 years of age. Additionally, 63% of RTIs were motorcycle-associated incidents. Two peak times of injury occurrence were observed: 12 am-4 pm and 8 pm-0 am. &quot;Hot spots&quot; of road traffic injuries/fatalities were identified in the city area and on main highways using Kernel density estimation. Interestingly, RTIs occurring along the two north-south main roads were not within easy access of trauma centers. Further, fatal cases, gender and injury mechanism were significantly associated with the distance between injury location and trauma centers.
Conclusions:
Geographical patterns of RTIs in Hanoi city differed by gender, time, and injury mechanism; such information may be useful for injury prevention. Specifically, RTIs occurring along the two north-south main roads have lower accessibility to trauma centers, thus an emergency medical service system should be established.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Takashi Nagata</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ayako Takamori</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yoshinari Kimura</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Akio Kimura</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Makoto Hashizume</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shinji Nakahara</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2011, null:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-09-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-5-11</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-5-11-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-09-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/10">
        <title>International benchmarking of tertiary trauma centers: productivity and throughput approach</title>
        <description>Background:
Care process in tertiary trauma centers consists of a chain of care phases in different departments from the emergency department (ED) to post-operative rehabilitation. The historical evolution of healthcare systems and organizations has led to variations in trauma patient processes in different countries. The present study is aimed at revealing differences in the throughput and productivity of trauma patient processes between German (UKB) and Finnish (HUS) tertiary trauma centers. Problems related to the comparison of different healthcare systems were also identified. The share of patients discharged was used as a control measure.
Results:
The biggest differences between the hospitals were found in the use of resources in the ED and in post-operative care. Despite problems in defining comparable patients and resources, ED productivity was significantly higher in UKB. Post-operative care was, on average, 41% shorter in HUS. However, the share of patients discharged was significantly higher in UKB (96.5% vs. 68.9%). Differences were also found in the pre-operative length of stay of patients with proximal femoral fractures (UKB: 0.97 days, HUS: 1.57 days). The productivity of the operating unit was quite similar in the hospitals. In terms of ED mortality, no statistically significant differences were found.
Conclusions:
The results of the present study showed significant differences in the use of resources and throughput times in trauma patient processes between Finnish and German hospitals. However, due to system-level differences between German and Finnish healthcare, the results cannot be directly transformed into development proposals for the organizations. On the other hand, in spite of certain differences regarding the healthcare systems, the demographic data of the trauma patients and medical procedures are comparable. Based on the present study, the ED process of severe trauma, pre-operative care, and operating unit processes were the most comparable parts of trauma care between the hospitals. The study also showed that the international benchmarking approach could be used to reveal bottlenecks in system-level policies and practices.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Antti Peltokorpi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lauri Handolin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Matthias Frank</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paulus Torkki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerrit Matthes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Axel Ekkernkamp</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eero Hirvensalo</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2011, null:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-08-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-5-10</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-5-10-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-08-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/9">
        <title>Patients Referred to a Norwegian Trauma Centre: 
effect of transfer distance on injury patterns, use of resources and outcomes
</title>
        <description>Background:
Triage and interhospital transfer are central to trauma systems. Few studies have addressed transferred trauma patients. This study investigated transfers of variable distances to OUH (Oslo University Hospital, Ullev&#229;l), one of the largest trauma centres in Europe.
Methods:
Patients included in the OUH trauma registry from 2001 to 2008 were included in the study. Demographic, injury, management and outcome data were abstracted. Patients were grouped according to transfer distance: &#8804;20 km, 21-100 km and &gt; 100 km.
Results:
Of the 7.353 included patients, 5.803 were admitted directly, and 1.550 were transferred. The number of transfers per year increased, and there was no reduction in injury severity during the study period. Seventy-six per cent of the transferred patients were severely injured. With greater transfer distances, injury severity increased, and there were larger proportions of traffic injuries, polytrauma and hypotensive patients. With shorter distances, patients were older, and head injuries and injuries after falls were more common. The shorter transfers less often activated the trauma team: &#8804;20 km -34%; 21-100 km -51%; &gt; 100 km -61%, compared to 92% of all directly admitted patients. The mortality for all transferred patients was 11%, but was unequally distributed according to transfer distance.
Conclusion:
This study shows heterogeneous characteristics and high injury severity among interhospital transfers. The rate of trauma team assessment was low and should be further examined. The mortality differences should be interpreted with caution as patients were in different phases of management. The descriptive characteristics outlined may be employed in the development of triage protocols and transfer guidelines.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Kristiansen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hans Lossius</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kjetil Soreide</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Petter Steen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christine Gaarder</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paal Naess</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2011, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-06-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-5-9</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-5-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-06-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/8">
        <title>HIV seroprevalence and its effect on outcome of moderate to severe burn injuries: A Ugandan experience</title>
        <description>Background:
HIV infection in a patient with burn injuries complicates the care of both the patient and the treating burn team. This study was conducted to establish the prevalence of HIV among burn patients in our setting and to compare the outcome of these patients who are HIV positive with those who are HIV negative.
Methods:
This was a prospective cohort study involving burn injury patients admitted to Mulago Hospital between November 2005 and February 2006. Patients were stratified into HIV positive (exposed) group and HIV-negative (unexposed) group. Data was collected using a pre-tested coded questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS statistical computer software version 11.5.
Results:
Of the 130 patients included in the study, 17 (13.1%) patients tested HIV positive and this formed the study (exposed) group. The remaining 113 patients (86.9%) formed the control (unexposed) group. In the HIV positive group, females outnumbered males by a ratio of 1.4:1 and the mean age was 28.4 &#177; 21.5 years (range 3 months-34 years). 64.7% of HIV positive patients reported to have risk factors for HIV infection. Of these, multiple sexual partners [Odds Ratio 8.44, 95% C.I. (3.87-143.23), P = 0.011] and alcoholism [Odds Ratio 8.34, 95% C.I. (5.76-17.82), P = 0.002] were found to be independently and significantly associated with increased risk to HIV infection. The mean CD4 count for HIV positive and HIV negative patients were 394 &#177; 328 cells/&#956;L and 912 &#177; 234 cells/&#956;L respectively which is statistically significant (P = 0.001). There was no difference in the bacteria cultured from the wounds of HIV positive and negative patients (P = 0.322). Patients with clinical signs of sepsis had lower CD4+ counts compared to patients without sepsis (P &lt; 0.001). ). Skin grafting was carried out in 35.3% of HIV negative patients and 29.4% of HIV positive patients with no significant difference in skin graft take and the degree of healed burn on discharge was the same (P = 0.324). There was no significant difference in hospital stay between HIV positive and negative patients (P = 0.674). The overall mortality rate was 11.5%. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, mortality rate was found to be independently and significantly related to the age of the patient, HIV positive with stigmata of AIDS, CD4 count, inhalation injury, %TBSA and severity of burn (p-value &lt; 0.001).
Conclusion:
HIV infection is prevalent among burn injury patients in our setting and thus presents an occupational hazard to health care workers who care for these patients. All burn health care workers in this region need to practice universal precautions in order to reduce the risk of exposure to HIV infection and post-exposure prophylaxis should be emphasized. The outcome of burn injury in HIV infected patients is dependent upon multiple variables such as age of the patient, inhalation injury and %TBSA and not the HIV status alone.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Phillipo Chalya</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Ssentongo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ignatius Kakande</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2011, null:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-06-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-5-8</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-5-8-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-06-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/7">
        <title>Etiological spectrum, injury characteristics and treatment outcome of maxillofacial injuries in a Tanzanian teaching hospital</title>
        <description>Background:
Maxillofacial injuries pose a therapeutic challenges to trauma, maxillofacial and plastic surgeons practicing in developing countries. This study was carried out to determine the etiology, injury characteristics and management outcome of maxillofacial injuries at our teaching hospital.Patients and MethodsA prospective hospital based study of maxillofacial injury patients was carried out at Bugando Medical Centre from November 2008 to October 2009. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using SPPS computer software version 11.5.
Results:
A total of 154 patients were studied. Males outnumbered females by a ratio of 2.7:1. Their mean age was 28.32 &#177; 16.48 years and the modal age group was 21-30 years. Most injuries were caused by road traffic crushes (57.1%), followed by assault and falls in 16.2% and 14.3% respectively. Soft tissue injuries and mandibular fractures were the most common type of injuries. Head/neck (53.1%) and limb injuries (28.1%) were the most prevalent associated injuries. Surgical debridement (95.1%) was the most common surgical procedures. Closed reduction of maxillofacial fractures was employed in 81.5% of patients. Open reduction and internal fixation was performed in 6.8% of cases. Complications occurred in 24% of patients, mainly due to infection and malocclusion. The mean duration of hospital stay was 18.12 &#177; 12.24 days. Mortality rate was 11.7%.
Conclusion:
Road traffic crashes remain the major etiological factor of maxillofacial injuries in our setting. Measures on prevention of road traffic crashes should be strongly emphasized in order to reduce the occurrence of these injuries.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Phillipo Chalya</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mabula Mchembe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Mabula</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Emmanuel Kanumba</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Japhet Gilyoma</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2011, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-06-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-5-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-5-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-06-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/6">
        <title>Intraoperative angioembolization in the management 
of pelvic-fracture related hemodynamic instability</title>
        <description>Background:
This case series report discusses patients presenting with hemorrhage and hemodymanic compromise due to severe pelvic fractures and undergoing intraoperative angioembolization (IAE) with other resuscitative procedures.
Methods:
We used portable digital subtraction fluoroscopy units for IAE in patients with severe pelvic hemorrhage and hemodynamic instability (5/03-4/09). Data was collected on demographics, injury severity, resource utilization, and outcomes at our Level 1 trauma center.
Results:
There were 6,538 adult admissions with 912 having pelvic fractures and 65 of these undergoing pelvic angioembolization. Twelve hemodynamically compromised patients (10 males, 2 females) had intraoperative pelvic angiography (age: 22-79 years; mean 51.3 &#177; 17.4). Injury severity score (ISS) was 37.5 &#177; 8.4 (22-50). Mean emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) was 57.4 min &#177; 47.9 with 10 patients transported directly to the OR and 2 to the SICU prior to OR. Ten of 12 patients underwent exploratory laparotomy followed by angioembolization. Mortality was 50%. Among the 6 survivors (ISS 22 - 50), all had a pre-op CT scan, five had an initial base deficit &lt;13, and four were transfused &#8804; 6 units pre-incision/pre-procedure. Four of the 6 survivors had unilateral embolization. In contrast, all 6 non-survivors (ISS 29-41) required massive transfusion prior to OR (&gt;6 units PRBCs) with 4 having a based deficit &gt;13. Three of these patients bypassed CT and five underwent bilateral internal iliac embolization (BIIE).
Conclusions:
IAE for severe pelvic hemorrhage can be successfully performed concurrently with exploratory laparotomy, pelvic packing or other resuscitative procedures. Patients most likely to benefit have a base deficit &lt;13, and do not require massive transfusion prior to IAE or suffer from a vertically unstable pelvis fracture.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Robert Cherry</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Goodspeed</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Frank Lynch</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Delgado</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>J. Reid</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2011, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-05-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-5-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-5-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-05-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/5">
        <title>Improving prehospital trauma management for skiers and snowboarders - need for on-slope triage?</title>
        <description>Background:
Injuries from skiing and snowboarding became a major challenge for emergency care providers in Switzerland. In the alpine setting, early assessment of injury and health status is essential for the initiation of adequate means of care and transport. Nevertheless, validated standardized protocols for on-slope triage are missing. This article can assist in understanding the characteristics of injured winter sportsmen and exigencies for future on-slope triage protocols.
Methods:
Six-year review of trauma cases in a tertiary trauma centre. Consecutive inclusion of all injured skiers and snowboarders aged &gt;15 (total sample) years with predefined, severe injury to the head, spine, chest, pelvis or abdomen (study sample) presenting at or being transferred to the study hospital. Descriptive analysis of age, gender and injury pattern.
Results:
Amongst 729 subjects (total sample) injured from skiing or snowboarding, 401 (55%, 54% of skiers and 58% of snowboarders) suffered from isolated limb injury. Amongst the remaining 328 subjects (study sample), the majority (78%) presented with monotrauma. In the study sample, injury to the head (52%) and spine (43%) was more frequent than injury to the chest (21%), pelvis (8%), and abdomen (5%). The three most frequent injury combinations were head/spine (10% of study sample), head/thorax (9%), and spine/thorax (6%). Fisher&apos;s exact test demonstrated an association for injury combinations of head/thorax (p &lt; 0.001), head/abdomen (p = 0.019), and thorax/abdomen (p &lt; 0.001).
Conclusion:
The data presented and the findings from previous investigations indicate the need for development of dedicated on-slope triage protocols. Future research must address the validity and practicality of diagnostic on-slope tests for rapid decision making by both professional and lay first responders. Thus, large-scale and detailed injury surveillance is the future research priority.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Rebecca Hasler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Uli Schmucker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dimitrios Evangelopoulos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ron Hirschberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heinz Zimmermann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aristomenis Exadaktylos</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2011, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-04-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-5-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-5-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-04-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/4">
        <title>Protective and risk factors in amateur equestrians and description of  injury patterns: A retrospective data analysis and a case - control survey</title>
        <description>Background:
In Switzerland there are about 150,000 equestrians. Horse related injuries, including head and spinal injuries, are frequently treated at our level I trauma centre.ObjectivesTo analyse injury patterns, protective factors, and risk factors related to horse riding, and to define groups of safer riders and those at greater risk
Methods:
We present a retrospective and a case-control survey at conducted a tertiary trauma centre in Bern, Switzerland.Injured equestrians from July 2000 - June 2006 were retrospectively classified by injury pattern and neurological symptoms. Injured equestrians from July-December 2008 were prospectively collected using a questionnaire with 17 variables. The same questionnaire was applied in non-injured controls. Multiple logistic regression was performed, and combined risk factors were calculated using inference trees.
Results:
Retrospective surveyA total of 528 injuries occured in 365 patients. The injury pattern revealed as follows: extremities (32%: upper 17%, lower 15%), head (24%), spine (14%), thorax (9%), face (9%), pelvis (7%) and abdomen (2%). Two injuries were fatal. One case resulted in quadriplegia, one in paraplegia.Case-control survey61 patients and 102 controls (patients: 72% female, 28% male; controls: 63% female, 37% male) were included. Falls were most frequent (65%), followed by horse kicks (19%) and horse bites (2%). Variables statistically significant for the controls were: Older age (p = 0.015), male gender (p = 0.04) and holding a diploma in horse riding (p = 0.004). Inference trees revealed typical groups less and more likely to suffer injury.
Conclusions:
Experience with riding and having passed a diploma in horse riding seem to be protective factors. Educational levels and injury risk should be graded within an educational level-injury risk index.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Rebecca Hasler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lena Gyssler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lorin Benneker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Luca Martinolli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andreas Schotzau</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heinz Zimmermann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aristomenis Exadaktylos</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2011, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-02-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-5-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-5-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-02-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/3">
        <title>Treatment course and outcomes following drug and alcohol-related traumatic injuries</title>
        <description>Background:
Alcohol and drug use is known to be a major factor affecting the incidence of traumatic injury. However, the ways in which immediate pre-injury substance use affects patients&apos; clinical care and outcomes remains unclear. The goal of the present study is to determine the associations between pre-injury use of alcohol or drugs and patient injury severity, hospital course, and clinical outcome.Materials and methodsThis study used more than 200,000 records from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), which is the largest trauma registry in the United States. Incidents in the NTDB were placed into one of four classes: alcohol related, drug related, alcohol-and-drug related, and substance negative. Logistic regression models were used to determine comorbid conditions or treatment complications that were significantly associated with pre-injury substance use. Hospital charges were associated with the presence or absence of drugs and alcohol, and patient outcomes were assessed using discharge disposition as delimited by the NTDB.
Results:
The rates of complications arising during treatment were 8.3, 10.9, 9.9 and 8.6 per one hundred incidents in the alcohol related, drug related, alcohol-and-drug related, and substance-negative classes, respectively. Regression models suggested that pre-injury alcohol use is associated with a 15% higher risk of infection, whereas pre-injury drug use is associated with a 30% higher risk of infection. Pre-injury substance use did not appear to significantly impact clinical outcomes following treatment for traumatic injury, however.
Conclusion:
This study suggests that pre-injury drug use is associated with a significantly higher complication rate. In particular, infection during hospitalization is a significant risk for both alcohol and drug related trauma visits, and drug-related trauma incidents are associated with increased risk for additional circulatory complications. Although drug and alcohol related trauma incidents are not associated with appreciably worse clinical outcomes, patients experiencing such complications are associated with significantly greater length of stay and higher hospitalization costs. Therefore significant benefits to trauma patients could be gained with enhanced surveillance for pre-injury substance use upon admission to the ED, and closer monitoring for infection or circulatory complications during their period of hospitalization.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Matthew Cowperthwaite</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Burnett</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2011, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-01-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-5-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-5-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-01-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/2">
        <title>Patients with Pelvic Fractures Due to Falls: A Paradigm that Contributed to Autopsy-based Audit of Trauma in Greece </title>
        <description>Background:
Evaluation of the pelvic fractures (PFx) population in auditing effective components of trauma care is the subject of this study.
Methods:
A retrospective, case-control, autopsy-based study compared a population with PFx to a control-group using a template with trauma outcome variables, which included demographics, ICD-9, intention, mechanisms, toxicology, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS-90), Injury Severity Score (ISS), causes of haemorrhage, comorbidity, survival time, pre-hospital response, in hospital data, location of death, and preventable deaths.
Results:
Of 970 consecutive patients with fatal falls, 209 (21.5%) had PFx and constituted the PFx-group while 761 (78.5%) formed the control-group.Multivariate analysis showed that gender, age, intention, and height of fall were risk factors for PFx. A 300% higher odds of a psychiatric history was found in the PFx-group compared to the control-group (p &lt; 0.001).The median ISS was 50 (17-75) for the PFx-group and 26 (1-75) for the control-group (p &lt; 0.0001). There were no patients with an ISS less than 16 in the PFx group.Associated injuries were significantly more common in the PFx-group than in the control-group. Potentially preventable deaths (ISS &lt; 75) constituted 78% (n = 163) of the PFx-group. The most common AIS3-5 injuries in the potentially preventable subset of patients were the lower extremities in 133 (81.6%), thorax in 130 (79.7%), abdomen/pelvic contents in 99 (60.7%), head in 95 (58.3%) and the spine in 26 (15.9%) patients.A subset of 126 (60.3%) potentially preventable deaths in the PFx-group had at least one AIS-90 code other than the PFx, denoting major haemorrhage. Deaths directly attributed to PFx were limited to 6 (2.9%).The median survival time was 30 minutes for the PFx-group and 20 hours for the control-group (p &lt; 0.001). For a one-group increment in the ISS-groups, the survival rates over the post-traumatic time intervals were reduced by 57% (p &lt; 0.0001).Pre-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the PFx-group i.e. 70.3% of the PFx-group versus 42.7% of the control-group (p &lt; 0.001).
Conclusions:
The PFx-group shared common causative risk factors, high severity and multiplicity of injuries that define the PFx-group as a paradigm of injury for audit. This reduced sample of autopsies substantially contributed to the audit of functional, infrastructural, management and prevention issues requiring transformation to reduce mortality.</description>
        <link>http://www.traumamanagement.org/content/5/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Iordanis Papadopoulos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nikolaos Kanakaris</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefanos Bonovas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>George Konstantoudakis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Konstantina Petropoulou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Spyridon Christodoulou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Olympia Kotsilianou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christos Leukidis</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes 2011, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-01-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-2897-5-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-2897-5-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Trauma Management &amp; Outcomes</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-2897</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-01-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

