Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

Antithrombotic therapy and outcomes of cervical arterial dissection in the trauma patient: a case series

Holly E Hinson1, M JB Stallmeyer2, Jon P Furuno3, Karen L Yarbrough1 and John W Cole14*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

3 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

4 Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes 2010, 4:13  doi:10.1186/1752-2897-4-13

Published: 13 December 2010

Abstract

Background

The use of antithrombotic therapy (anticoagulants and/or antiplatelets) in the setting of traumatic cervical arterial dissection (CAD) for the prevention of stroke remains controversial. This issue is further complicated by the frequent co-existence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and other intracranial injuries, and also the wide variability in treatment due to a lack of evidence-based guidance. To address these controversies, a registry in a major Level I trauma center was created. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the safety of antithrombotic therapy in post-traumatic CAD. Analysis from the first year is presented.

Methods

All cervical dissections from the year 2005 were identified in patients at least 18 years of age by diagnosis code from radiology and trauma databases. Presence of arterial injury and grade, and other intracranial disease or injury such as stroke was diagnosed by a trauma radiologist and adjudicated by a neuroradiologist.

Results

Fifty-five patients with cervical artery dissection were identified. Fourteen patients presented with a total of 20 acute, post-traumatic intracranial hemorrhages (ICH). Seven of the 14 patients with ICH were treated with antithrombotic therapy, and none extended their intracranial hemorrhages. Of the 41 patients without pre-existing ICH, 28 were treated with antithrombotic therapy and only one developed an interval hematoma. Among all 55 cases, two patients developed an acute ischemic stroke in the territory of the dissected artery after admission; both patients were in the untreated group.

Conclusion

In so far as antithrombotic therapy may offer benefit in preventing early ischemic stroke following cervical artery dissection, these data suggest withholding antiplatelet or other antithrombotics following trauma may not be warranted, even in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage. From a safety perspective, this registry-based case series indicates antithrombotic management of arterial injury did not contribute to development or progression of ICH, even in patients with pre-existing ICH. This data suggest that instituting early antithrombotic therapy presents a low risk of ICH or hemorrhage extension among traumatic cervical dissection patients.