Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes


Open Access Research

Outcome after severe head injury: focal surgical lesions do not imply a better Glasgow Outcome Score than diffuse injuries at 3 months

Paul Leach1, Omar N Pathmanaban1*, Hiren C Patel1, Julian Evans1, Raphael Sacho1, Richard Protheroe2 and Andrew T King1

Author Affiliations

1 Division of Neurosurgery, GMNC, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

2 Department of Neurointensive Care, GMNC, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes 2009, 3:5 doi:10.1186/1752-2897-3-5

Published: 3 April 2009

Abstract

Background

Historically neurosurgeons have accepted head injured patients only in the presence of a mass lesion requiring surgical decompression. Underpinning this is an assumption that these patients have a better outcome than patients without a surgical lesion. This has meant that many patients without a surgical lesion have been managed locally in the referring hospital. However, there is now evidence that treatment of all head injured patients in a specialist centre leads to improved outcomes. Therefore, we have asked the question: does the presence of a surgical lesion imply better outcome from severe head injury?

Results

We prospectively recorded the Glasgow Outcome score (GOS), at 3 months, of all the severely head injured patients treated at our institution over a two and a half year period. Of 116 patients admitted with an initial Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 8 or less, 58 had surgical lesions and 58 non-surgical head injuries. The two groups were well matched for presenting GCS and age. Overall our favourable outcome rate (GOS 4 and 5) at 3-months for the patients with a surgical lesion and for the non-surgical group were 47.3% and 46.6% respectively, with no significant difference between the two (P = 0.54).

Conclusion

The assumption in the past has always been that patients presenting in coma from traumatic diffuse brain injury will do worse than those that have a mass lesion amenable to surgical decompression. Our series would suggest that this is not the case and all severely head injured patients should expect similar outcome when cared for in a neuroscience centre.