|
Summary of patient profiles, treatment methods & final outcomes |
|||||||
| Patient No: |
Age |
Sex |
Side |
Type |
Treatment |
Complications |
Final Outcome (Karlstrom criteria) |
|
|
|||||||
| 1 |
40 |
M |
R |
2B |
Other |
None |
Excellent |
| 2 |
19 |
M |
L |
2B |
Other |
Infection |
Poor |
| 3 |
56 |
M |
R |
2B |
Other |
None |
Excellent |
| 4 |
27 |
M |
R |
2A |
Other |
Delayed union |
Poor |
| 5 |
24 |
M |
R |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Excellent |
| 6 |
42 |
M |
L |
2A |
Other |
None |
Good |
| 7 |
27 |
M |
L |
1 |
Both IM nail |
Foot drop |
Acceptable |
| 8 |
24 |
M |
R |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Excellent |
| 9 |
21 |
M |
R |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Excellent |
| 10 |
32 |
F |
L |
2B |
Other |
Knee stiff |
Good |
| 11 |
30 |
M |
R |
2B |
Both IM nail |
None |
Excellent |
| 12 |
21 |
M |
L |
1 |
Other |
Knee stiff |
Good |
| 13 |
35 |
M |
R |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Excellent |
| 14 |
22 |
F |
R |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Good |
| 15 |
20 |
M |
L |
1 |
Both IM nail |
Delayed union |
Poor |
| 16 |
22 |
M |
R |
1 |
Both IM nail |
Infection |
Good |
| 17 |
35 |
M |
R |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Excellent |
| 18 |
19 |
M |
R |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Excellent |
| 19 |
22 |
M |
R |
0 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Excellent |
| 20 |
40 |
M |
L |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Good |
| 21 |
22 |
M |
R |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Excellent |
| 22 |
35 |
M |
L |
2A |
Other |
Knee stiff |
Acceptable |
| 23 |
24 |
M |
R |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Good |
| 24 |
25 |
M |
R |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Excellent |
| 25 |
18 |
M |
R |
2B |
Both IM nail |
None |
Excellent |
| 26 |
28 |
M |
L |
1 |
Other |
Knee stiff |
Good |
| 27 |
22 |
M |
L |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Excellent |
| 28 |
31 |
M |
R |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Excellent |
| 29 |
26 |
M |
R |
1 |
Both IM nail |
None |
Good |
Rethnam et al. Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes 2007 1:2 doi:10.1186/1752-2897-1-2 |
|||||||